Miloslav Trmač (mitr@xxxxxxxx) said: > Because the Fedora 11 RPM packages will use SHA-256 for file digests in > the RPM headers, upgrades from earlier releases to Fedora 11 will > replace user-modified %config files (without noreplace) by their > original versions, and rename the user-modified files to *.rpmsave. > > The Fedora packaging guidelines already suggest using %config(noreplace) > in most cases: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Configuration_files . > > Please review use of %config without noreplace in your packages, and add > noreplace if appropriate. The list of affected packages is below. Given that it's comparing hashes, and the old hash is *obviously* of a different type than the new hash, why can't these sorts of conflicts be caught? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
