Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Considering we already agreed to do it i thin we should assume we are unless > we have reason not to. this time all we have done is make the rpms reflect > what has been the case for awhile. Anyone who wants to continue i586 support > post F11 i look forward to talking to about setting up i586 as a secondary > arch. > nitpick: I think we've been i486+ for quite a while rather than i586+. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
