On Friday 20 February 2009 03:49:57 pm Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> said: > > Considering we already agreed to do it i thin we should assume we are > > unless we have reason not to. this time all we have done is make the > > rpms reflect what has been the case for awhile. Anyone who wants to > > continue i586 support post F11 i look forward to talking to about setting > > up i586 as a secondary arch. > > Is it really worth it to do a mass rebuild for F11 to go to i586, then > turn around in a few months and do the same thing again for i686? > > If i686 is worth it, why not go to i686 today? If it isn't worth it > today, what is going to make it worth it in less than 6 months? Its too late in the release cycle to drop support for an arch. however we wont have to do a rebuild of everything for i686 it can happen over the development lifecycle for F-12. Dennis -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
