Re: x86_32 yum $basearch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> said:
> Considering we already agreed to do it i thin we should assume we are unless 
> we have reason not to.  this time all we have done is make the rpms reflect 
> what has been the case for awhile.  Anyone who wants to continue i586 support 
> post F11 i look forward to talking to about setting up i586 as a secondary 
> arch.

Is it really worth it to do a mass rebuild for F11 to go to i586, then
turn around in a few months and do the same thing again for i686?

If i686 is worth it, why not go to i686 today?  If it isn't worth it
today, what is going to make it worth it in less than 6 months?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux