On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:14:45AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: >On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 10:57 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37:13AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: >> >On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 10:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > >> >> Or you could just have: >> >> >> >> x86 >> >> x86_64 >> >> ppc >> >> ppc64 >> >> sparc >> >> sparc64 >> >> >> >> etc. >> >> >> >> Naming repos after specific arches just seems like pain. This is >> >> one area where ppc does things right. You don't see things like: >> > >> >I wasn't naming them after specific arches. I was saying we can use >> >symlinks to solve the arch complexity and the confusion with what >> >$basearch should be vs what pkgs are in the repo. >> >> Ugh. >> > >I understand it is not the most attractive solution - but it felt like >the best choice considering that it looks like we'll drop i586 entirely >with F12. At least this way the i586 dir will vanish for F12 and there >won't be any accidental upgrades. I was Ughing at my complete lack of comprehension on what you were talking about. Not about your suggestion :). As for i586 going away for F12, it may or it may not. Doing this two releases in a row still doesn't strike me as a great idea. At the very least it will need to be revisited by the FESCo that is in place for the F12 cycle. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
