On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:37:13AM -0500, seth vidal wrote: >On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 10:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Or you could just have: >> >> x86 >> x86_64 >> ppc >> ppc64 >> sparc >> sparc64 >> >> etc. >> >> Naming repos after specific arches just seems like pain. This is >> one area where ppc does things right. You don't see things like: > >I wasn't naming them after specific arches. I was saying we can use >symlinks to solve the arch complexity and the confusion with what >$basearch should be vs what pkgs are in the repo. Ugh. >> I'll probably get the "tradition" and "you don't know what you're >> talking about" arguments thrown at me. My opinions won't change :). > >Interesting. I don't know what 'tradition' you're talking about. But >knowing that your opinions won't change makes me less likely to continue >discussing it w/you. Actually, let's go with the "you don't know what you're talking about" thing. For some reason I can't explain I thought we were discussing something else. Consider this my 'jerkcity' email for the year. Sorry. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
