On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 10:31 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > Or you could just have: > > x86 > x86_64 > ppc > ppc64 > sparc > sparc64 > > etc. > > Naming repos after specific arches just seems like pain. This is > one area where ppc does things right. You don't see things like: I wasn't naming them after specific arches. I was saying we can use symlinks to solve the arch complexity and the confusion with what $basearch should be vs what pkgs are in the repo. > for ppc32, or: > > 970 > power3 > power4 > power5 > > for ppc64. > > I'll probably get the "tradition" and "you don't know what you're > talking about" arguments thrown at me. My opinions won't change :). Interesting. I don't know what 'tradition' you're talking about. But knowing that your opinions won't change makes me less likely to continue discussing it w/you. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
