Hi, On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Agreed, IMO, "self-provided requires" should go, everything else should > stay. > > Unfortunately, rpm's filtering doesn't do so and manually adding filters > is more error-prone than it helps. ... and doing this in the filters would basically means running the provides generator twice, which seems silly. On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:40:57PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I'm not going to report it, since I'm still unsure what should be > correct way. #486161 Not only that I'm more cheeky, it also seems like a good idea to have that in the bugzilla, with the right explanation for NOTABUG or WONTFIX. (Unless I get a DUPLICATE. :-( ) Have a nice day, Stepan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
