During the review for perl-NOCpulse-Object (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485893 ) I have noticed that
rpmbuild adds as requires some items which are provided by this very
package (abreged version below):
[wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --provides
/home/wolfy/reports/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
perl(NOCpulse::AbstractObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::BlockingDBMNamespace)
perl(NOCpulse::BlockingFileNamespace)
perl(NOCpulse::DBMObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::INIObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::MultiFileObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::NSObject)
perl(NOCpulse::Namespace)
perl(NOCpulse::Object) = 1.26
perl(NOCpulse::ObjectProxy)
perl(NOCpulse::ObjectProxyServer)
perl(NOCpulse::PersistentObject)
perl(NOCpulse::SharedBlockingNamespace)
perl-NOCpulse-Object = 1.26.9-1.fc11
[wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires
/home/wolfy/reports/perl-NOCpulse-Object/perl-NOCpulse-Object-1.26.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
perl(NOCpulse::AbstractObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::DBMObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::Debug)
perl(NOCpulse::INIObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::MultiFileObjectRepository)
perl(NOCpulse::Namespace)
perl(NOCpulse::Object)
perl(NOCpulse::SharedBlockingNamespace)
The packager thinks this is OK, I think that they should be filtered
out. Could we have a second opinion, please ?
Manuel
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
