On Friday 13 February 2009, Florian Festi wrote: > Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Regarding policy changes, one candidate for addition would be that if a > > non-noarch package does noarch subpackages, it MUST BuildRequire > > rpm-build >= 4.6.0. Or if there's a way to wrap the "BuildArch: noarch" > > for subpackages in a %if $something ... %endif where $something evaluates > > to true only in rpmbuild versions supporting these noarch subpackages, > > that'd be ok too. [...] > > I agree that this is a problem. But I very much dislike putting > BuildRequires to rpm versions into spec files. If we start with that every > package will have them very soon. We - RPM upstream - are already working > on the next improvements for rpmbuild that would also lead to such > BuildRequires. Even worse is that they will get outdated easily and > unnoticed - as they are only being some last line of defence - and though > be useless when they are really needed. What about the '%if $something ... %endif where $something evaluates to true only in rpmbuild versions supporting these noarch subpackages' alternative? Many package maintainers would like to use the exact same specfile for many distro versions (not only Fedora, but at least EPEL as well). Related ticket: http://rpm.org/ticket/33 What I've found "working" so far is ugliness like this, I hope something better emerges: %define rpmver %(v=`rpmbuild --version | sed -e 's/.* //'` ; echo ${v:-0}) [...] %package foo %if "%{rpmver}" > "4.6.0" BuildArch: noarch %endif [...] -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
