On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:27:43PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > How will this work with proprietary software authors who want to > > distribute their software as RPMs? (Or, more realistically, for > > people who package up proprietary software as RPMs for ease of > > installation)? > > It won't affect them at all unless they try to pass off their i386 blob as > noarch (which I don't think they want to do anyway, and if they do, they > should fix it "yesterday"). Does this mix up what is (rightly) Fedora policy, with general rpm usage? I can see a place for this in rpmlint, or in some much-needed adjunct to Koji, but I'm not sure why we would have it in rpm. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
