On Friday 13 February 2009, Florian Festi wrote: > I'll answer this in one mail each topic to avoid mixed up threads. > > Ville Skyttä wrote: > > What about F-10, and noarch-subpackage updates to packages that were all > > arch-specific before be shipped for it, or if this is F-11+ only? This > > is obviously dependent on whether the needed infrastructure changes > > include support for doing this for F-10 as well, but I think it'd be nice > > to be explicit about it in case it'd be technically doable in the > > infrastructure but no go for some other reasons. > > As far as I understood there is only one koji instance for all releases > (will someone from the infrastructure team please correct me) and rpm 4.6 > is in F10 for quite a while. So technical it should be possible to build > noarch sub packages in F10. Whether we want to change a lot of packages in > F10 for that is another question. FWIW, IMO it doesn't make sense to change /any/ packages in F-10 _for this feature only_. What I meant was whether doing noarch subpackages while at it when pushing other usual F-10 updates would be ok. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
