On Sunday 15 February 2009 11:56:42 am Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Friday 13 February 2009, Florian Festi wrote: > > I'll answer this in one mail each topic to avoid mixed up threads. > > > > Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > What about F-10, and noarch-subpackage updates to packages that were > > > all arch-specific before be shipped for it, or if this is F-11+ only? > > > This is obviously dependent on whether the needed infrastructure > > > changes include support for doing this for F-10 as well, but I think > > > it'd be nice to be explicit about it in case it'd be technically doable > > > in the infrastructure but no go for some other reasons. > > > > As far as I understood there is only one koji instance for all releases > > (will someone from the infrastructure team please correct me) and rpm 4.6 > > is in F10 for quite a while. So technical it should be possible to build > > noarch sub packages in F10. Whether we want to change a lot of packages > > in F10 for that is another question. > > FWIW, IMO it doesn't make sense to change /any/ packages in F-10 _for this > feature only_. What I meant was whether doing noarch subpackages while at > it when pushing other usual F-10 updates would be ok. Yes, when they are supported by koji. which will be after next weekend. Until then its not possible to build them. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
