On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This is quite severe: I just recompiled banshee, gnome-do and tomboy, >> and none of them works even after recompilation (with wildly different >> errors). Is the Mono 2.4 snapshot we have in Rawhide currently usable? >> >> (Monodevelop still works, but it's an older snapshot) >> >> Given that gcc 4.4 was tested using a separate dist tag before it hits >> Rawhide, should we consider doing the same for the Mono stack? > > Would be useful I would think. I also wish the mono packages used the > release tag scheme for pre release and betas like everyone else > > IE > mono-2.4-0.5.pre2.20090502svn125709.fc11 > instead of > mono-2.4-5.pre2.20090502svn125709.fc11 > > as per the package naming guidelines here > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > I mentioned this to Paul already, but has received no response. It's worse for monodevelop: monodevelop-1.9.2-pre1.20090116svn123651.fc11.x86_64 Though at least RPM is sane enough to sort letters before numbers, so 1.9.2-pre1 is below 1.9.2-1, but yes, this makes Mono package versions rather inconsistent. -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
