On Feb 8, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 14:57:21 +0100,
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le Sam 7 février 2009 04:18, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit :
PS: what was the advantage of having this sort of oddities in the
changelog, except for proving the fact that "we can" ?
What's wrong with checking we can and a tool developer didn't re-add
some UTF-8 incompatible processing after all the pain we had cleaning
up rpm and yum of those problems?
Note that bad stuff does creep back in. Last fall I filed some bugs
against packages where the changelog files had used iso-8859-1 instead
of utf-8. I haven't been running createrepo lately, but wouldn't be
surprised
if more of this hadn't creeped back in.
Like this?
Pungi:INFO: Making repodata
Previous repo file missing:
709/1419 - Packages/exempi-2.1.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
iso-8859-1 encoding on Kristian H?gsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.1.3-4
846/1419 - Packages/cpp-4.3.2-7.x86_64.rpm
iso-8859-1 encoding on Kristian H?gsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.1.3-4
884/1419 - Packages/sound-theme-freedesktop-0.2-2.fc10.noarch.rpm
iso-8859-1 encoding on Kristian H?gsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.1.3-4
1378/1419 - Packages/
wpa_supplicant-0.6.4-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm .rpm
iso-8859-1 encoding on Kristian H?gsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.1.3-4
1419/1419 - Packages/atk-1.24.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm
Saving Primary metadata
joe
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
