2009/2/7 David Nielsen <gnomeuser@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> banshee-1.4.2-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> banshee-1.4.2-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> banshee-1.4.2-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.3.0.0 >> f-spot-0.5.0.3-5.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> f-spot-0.5.0.3-5.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> f-spot-0.5.0.3-5.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.3.0.0 >> gnome-do-0.8.0-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> gnome-do-0.8.0-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.3.0.0 >> tomboy-0.13.4-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Setup) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> tomboy-0.13.4-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins.Gui) = >> 0:0.3.0.0 >> tomboy-0.13.4-1.fc11.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 0:0.3.0.0 > > A heads up would have been nice Paul ;) > This is quite severe: I just recompiled banshee, gnome-do and tomboy, and none of them works even after recompilation (with wildly different errors). Is the Mono 2.4 snapshot we have in Rawhide currently usable? (Monodevelop still works, but it's an older snapshot) Given that gcc 4.4 was tested using a separate dist tag before it hits Rawhide, should we consider doing the same for the Mono stack? -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
