Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:13:57 +0100
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Callum Lerwick wrote:
> We're going to need this eventually. As flash drives get bigger, FAT
> becomes more and more undesirable.

That's what ext2/ext3/ext4 is for.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays
  - From: Till Maas
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Callum Lerwick

References:
- Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for
  - From: Chris Adams
- Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for
  - From: Benny Amorsen
- Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: drago01
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Callum Lerwick
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
  - From: Callum Lerwick

Prev by Date: Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
Next by Date: Re: Why are updates processed so slowly?
Previous by thread: Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
Next by thread: Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]