Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benny Amorsen wrote:
>> What are the chances GRUB/syslinux could be taught to look at a few
>> special CPU flags (can you fetch the important flags from real mode?)
>> and only present "compatible" (as determined by config arguments, not
>> GRUB/syslinux poking into kernels) boot options?  That would help the
>> LiveCD case as well.  You could have both 32-PAE and 64 kernels on the
>> CD and choose at boot time, although that would take up a large amount
>> of space (so maybe not feasible for LiveCD).
> 
> That would be rather neat. Tricky, but neat.

But our live images are already heavily size-constrained. There's definitely
no room for multiple kernels on the KDE live image, and I don't think the
GNOME image has any room left either.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux