Re: Validity of the CD size limit nowadays [Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 17:12 +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Jan Kratochvil
> <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:57:50 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> But our live images are already heavily size-constrained. There's definitely
> >> no room for multiple kernels on the KDE live image, and I don't think the
> >> GNOME image has any room left either.
> >
> > Was already discussed the requirement of CDs nowadays?  Even the oldest
> > computers already have DVD and I miss more a fully-featured LiveDVD 5GB spin.
> 
> Well for x86_64 we can/should do this.
> Good luck on finding a x86_64 computer/laptop without a DVD drive.

The problem isn't DVD readers, it's DVD writers. I sure don't own any,
and I have two x86-64 machines. I've had enough problems with CDRs being
unreliable, somehow I don't think higher density is going to help any. I
feel my money is better spent on more HDs and flash drives.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux