>> >> So we should ignore OLPC that is deploying 100's of thousands all >> >> running Fedora? >> > >> > Modest proposal: OLPC might benefit from running its own koji instance >> > and effectively going the secondary arch route. -Os -march=geode, etc. >> > Given how close it is to mainline x86 it's unlikely to have funky >> > compilation failures, and it has to branch a non-trivial number of >> > packages anyway. >> >> Actually the forked packages now are pretty minimal. I think there's >> currently around a dozen, with the move the F11 that will be even >> less. The major fork is the kernel but other than that most of the >> forks are to slim down deps. > > Okay, ignore the bit about forked packages. How's the rest of the > argument sound? Sounds fine to me but I'm by no means an expert in compiler options for different architectures :-) What sort of a win would we see performance wise. Does it get done for all the packages or for just things like kernel/glibc/openssl like it currently does for some of the i386 packages? Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
