On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 06:39 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> > Just a note, I believe that the ia32 support should "concentrate" on > >> > netbooks (So Intel Atom), those are the only new things on the market > >> > that can't run x86_64, and the userbase of those will just grow and > >> > every percent of extra performance will make many people happy. > >> > >> So we should ignore OLPC that is deploying 100's of thousands all > >> running Fedora? > > > > Modest proposal: OLPC might benefit from running its own koji instance > > and effectively going the secondary arch route. -Os -march=geode, etc. > > Given how close it is to mainline x86 it's unlikely to have funky > > compilation failures, and it has to branch a non-trivial number of > > packages anyway. > > Actually the forked packages now are pretty minimal. I think there's > currently around a dozen, with the move the F11 that will be even > less. The major fork is the kernel but other than that most of the > forks are to slim down deps. Okay, ignore the bit about forked packages. How's the rest of the argument sound? - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
