>> > Just a note, I believe that the ia32 support should "concentrate" on >> > netbooks (So Intel Atom), those are the only new things on the market >> > that can't run x86_64, and the userbase of those will just grow and >> > every percent of extra performance will make many people happy. >> >> So we should ignore OLPC that is deploying 100's of thousands all >> running Fedora? > > Modest proposal: OLPC might benefit from running its own koji instance > and effectively going the secondary arch route. -Os -march=geode, etc. > Given how close it is to mainline x86 it's unlikely to have funky > compilation failures, and it has to branch a non-trivial number of > packages anyway. Actually the forked packages now are pretty minimal. I think there's currently around a dozen, with the move the F11 that will be even less. The major fork is the kernel but other than that most of the forks are to slim down deps. Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
