Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > How does a general question like that apply to this specific situation? > To me, it's clear that Chitlesh would like to see what is Free to be > available in Fedora, to encourage further development of what is not > Free yet. But there are other people in the field who believe this is counterproductive, see for example the reply from the Toped author: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-electronic-lab-list/2009-January/msg00016.html >> Promoting proprietary software which happens to run on Fedora is not what >> Fedora is about. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash That wiki page is hardly "what Fedora is about" and in fact I believe it is counterproductive. We should instead point people to Gnash and/or Swfdec. Or just not recommend consuming Flash content at all, just like we do for DVDs and MP3s. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
