On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 09:34 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > i.e. if you've got a big, potentially very broken re-base to a new > > upstream it would be a good idea to test locally, then push to rawhide > > for a while, then updates-testing for another while and, finally, push > > to updates. > Well, once a package is in rawhide, it in almost all cases sooner or > later enters "stable", because there often is no way back. > > I.e. packages must already provide a certain amount of stability before > entering rawhide. A mechanically/blindly/careless pushing packages into > rawhide approach, hoping they will mature there, will hardly work. Agree 100% - hence the "test locally" bit. Rawhide is useless if it's so broken no-one tests it. Cheers, Mark. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
