On 29.01.2009 11:11, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:14:48 +0000, Mark wrote:
Okay, here's an attempt:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Markmc/Draft_package_update_guidelines
[...]
Much better, an effort much appreciated, although this is way beyond
the subject of this thread. ;)
That's what I thought as well. The fist draft from Rahul was more a
"what information to add to bodhi updates request"; this one also
touches "Maintaining Stability".
And it does so without answering the question properly. So it will
continue as now: Some maintainers will use a debian-like style, others
more a rolling-release style. That's a bit confusing from a users point
of view.
Such a document goes into the right
direction, since it tries to explain Fedora's fundamental update
strategy and may come as a surprise to some packagers. It will be very
interesting to hear what FESCo members think about the contents.
+1
CU
knurd
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
