On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:23:42 +0100, Dominik wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 January 2009 at 19:18, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > [...] > > --- > > > > * All Updates must refer to a upstream changelog or equivalent if one > > exists. Otherwise a brief description (a couple of sentence at most) > > justifying the need for an update must be provided by the maintainers > > pushing the update. > > > > * If there are downstream bugs being fixed or intended to be fixed with > > an update, it must be referred within the update. Maintainers can choose > > to let bodhi auto close bugs or close it manually as well. > > This is redundant. bodhi has a field for bug numbers and it's pretty > self-explanatory. Bodhi itself, however, floods those bugzilla tickets with comments. The most confusing comment is the one that notifies about "submitted" (= pending) updates, which are only available within koji. If we talk about "real users", this is the first comment that ought to be killed, since users are confused a lot by updates, which are not available. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
