>> > so what's the point? Yum's changelog plugin is >> > much more useful than this proposal will ever be. >> >> Actually, that's my fallback when no infos are provided in PK. >> >> But that doesn't take away the fact that having infos in PK would be >> really nice :) > > Sure, file a bug. I didn't know we could get the ChangeLog comments from > yum. There's already support for it in the PK API. No, I was talking about the infos about the update, the ones the discussion is about, not the rpm changelog ! As said previously, it doesn't necessarily make sense (depending on who is speaking) to have the rpm changelog displayed as the information update in PK. ---------- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) French Fedora Ambassador ---------- "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
