>> Please be specific in your comments and try and be constructive. Thank you. > > Nobody reads these anyway, I do (should I feel ashamed or something ? :-/) > so what's the point? Yum's changelog plugin is > much more useful than this proposal will ever be. Actually, that's my fallback when no infos are provided in PK. But that doesn't take away the fact that having infos in PK would be really nice :) About the proposed guideline, well, I can't say if it will be a burden with the huge number of packages I maintain (yes, 4, not sure my opinion matters ^^), but I've always felt "hey, what should I write in this field in Bohdi ?" (didn't even know it was what would appear in PK), so this would at least be some indications on what I'll try to write in the future. Regards, ---------- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) French Fedora Ambassador ---------- "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
