Re: Lack of update information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/1/27 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:17 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>>  Yes, actually I did.  Perhaps I misunderstood your meaning here: are
>> you saying that it's policy in Fedora that a maintainer should not
>> keep their packages up to date in the best fashion that their
>> judgement suggests, in line with the above?
>
> No, I'm trying to illustrate that there is a difference between
> "tracking upstream" and making judgment calls on proper updates for a
> release, and in fact we have policy about it.

Obviously there's a difference; but just because two things are
different doesn't mean they can't be done concomitantly, or that
they're mutally exclusive.  e.g. I can eat both an apple and an
orange.

                            -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux