On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:17 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > Yes, actually I did. Perhaps I misunderstood your meaning here: are > you saying that it's policy in Fedora that a maintainer should not > keep their packages up to date in the best fashion that their > judgement suggests, in line with the above? No, I'm trying to illustrate that there is a difference between "tracking upstream" and making judgment calls on proper updates for a release, and in fact we have policy about it. > > In any case, this is off-topic to the discussion; the question is > about imposing another manual task on a maintainer, rather than how > maintainers should exercise their judgement as to pushing updates > (which the above quote appears to address quite nicely). -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
