Re: Lack of update information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 14:07 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
>  
> And that's exactly what we are (or should be) doing; we just don't
> write an essay about it afterwards :-)

Did you actually read the link?

* Package Maintainers should not push every single upstream update to
all branches. Examine the changes in each upstream release and ask if
the update is worth download and update time for many users. For
upstreams that update very often with many small updates, consider
waiting and updated only when the amount of changes is worth updating.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux