Re: Draft: simple update description guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 20:49 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>  
> Whatever:  I don't care much about this specific set of rules. It just 
> seems to me a general trend that more and more rules and guidelines are 
> put into place in Fedora-land; and more and more work is outsourced onto 
> the packagers. Sure, some of the rules and the outsourcing is needed -- 
> but I find this trend very alarming.

The alarming trend is the folks who won't do things, unless there is a
guideline for them.  I hate having an abundance of guidlines just like
you do, however almost all the recent guidelines have been done in
reaction to a lack of people following "best practices".  Ergo we create
guidelines to /help/ people understand what those best practices are.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux