On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:47 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote: > And all obviated by Fedora policy and practice: we expressly give and > expect maintainers to exercise their judgement here. > > Unless, of course, we need a Committee of Update Oversight set up...? > Maybe a new set of highly detailed guidelines, detailing when and how > updates are to be blessed and released to the great unwashed, or cast > asunder? Given that we have maintainers not following the policy, we need to do something. By having maintainers mention in the update request /why/ they are issuing an update, it's far easier to spot check and verify. Trust, but verify. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
