Re: Lack of update information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Luke Macken <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:56:58AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> If they're really such minor and uninteresting changes, why push them
>> out to users?  Why consume infrastructure resources to build, releng
>> resources to sign and push, bandwidth resources to mirror, bandwidth
>> resources and cpu resources on the clients to consume the metadata, and
>> cpu / disk resources on the clients to do the update?
>
> All good questions.

And all obviated by Fedora policy and practice: we expressly give and
expect maintainers to exercise their judgement here.

Unless, of course, we need a Committee of Update Oversight set up...?
Maybe a new set of highly detailed guidelines, detailing when and how
updates are to be blessed and released to the great unwashed, or cast
asunder?

                             -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux