On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:34 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 16:26 -0500, seth vidal a écrit : > > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 15:22 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > > > > No. I want to update everything currently installed, and be /offered/ > > > anything new. By "new packages" I mean "packages that didn't exist last > > > time I ran updates" (as opposed to "updates of already installed > > > packages"). Sorry for the confusion. > > > > Well having them 'offered' implies interactivity in a way that I very > > much doubt we'll have. If the group has new pkgs in it then those are > > requirements, not recommendations. > > You can probably implement this by making the magic auto metapackage be > "@name-timestamp" instead of "@name" with no auto-update of its content. > And then add a yum command that shows the diff between installed > "@name-timestamp" and "@name-currenttimestamp", and proposes switching > from one to the other. That seems like more of a special case than I'd like and it means 'yum update' doesn't do what I would expect it to do. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
