Le mercredi 14 janvier 2009 à 16:26 -0500, seth vidal a écrit : > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 15:22 -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > > No. I want to update everything currently installed, and be /offered/ > > anything new. By "new packages" I mean "packages that didn't exist last > > time I ran updates" (as opposed to "updates of already installed > > packages"). Sorry for the confusion. > > Well having them 'offered' implies interactivity in a way that I very > much doubt we'll have. If the group has new pkgs in it then those are > requirements, not recommendations. You can probably implement this by making the magic auto metapackage be "@name-timestamp" instead of "@name" with no auto-update of its content. And then add a yum command that shows the diff between installed "@name-timestamp" and "@name-currenttimestamp", and proposes switching from one to the other. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
