Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Perhaps this would be a good compromise -- using randomization to > > eliminate bias that favors quantity of simpler reviews. > > But it also eliminates the incentive to continue doing reviews in that year > once you hit the magical threshold 'N'. Don't use a threshold then, just give each reviewer one ticket in the lottery for each package reviewed (but make sure nobody gets more than one prize). Or only give out tickets as above to anybody who did more than N. Or give out max(0, reviews - N + 1) tickets. There are many variations possible (give an extra ticket in the lottery to new reviewers, give extra tickets for reviewing a package that person hasn't reviewed before, give extra tickets for packages for which that person is the lone reviewer, ...) -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
