Re: Package Review Stats for 2008

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/04/2009 01:16 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
Perhaps this would be a good compromise -- using randomization to
eliminate bias that favors quantity of simpler reviews.

But it also eliminates the incentive to continue doing reviews in that year
once you hit the magical threshold 'N'.
Come on, Kevin, if someone does reviews just for the "award"/"reward"/"prize"/whatever-else-we-call-it, [s]he should not be here in the first place. We do it for the community, not for a personal pride. You've reached the threshold ? Fine. The community thanks you. Now, go on.


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux