On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:32 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote: > > > > > > Looking at the stats the top 5 reviewers did something like 44% of all > > > package reviews. One of the things I'd like to work on improving in > > > 2009 is to increase the number of reviews done by the folks that did 10 > > > or fewer reviews in 2008, since this is where the bulk of our package > > > reviewers lie. > > > > I don't want to short the "long tail" of reviewers, so perhaps we > > could arrange for a smaller but still significant reward for people > > who did more than "N" reviews. > > Yeah, we briefly discussed in the Package Review sig perhaps having a > random drawing of folks that completed x-number of reviews for a period > of time (something like 3 months), and sending them some form of Fedora > swag. Perhaps this would be a good compromise -- using randomization to eliminate bias that favors quantity of simpler reviews. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpbQLzlMjsQ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
