2009/1/3 Thomas Moschny <thomas.moschny@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/1/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >>> Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even >>> flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews >>> of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review >>> of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review >>> queue for many months and needed lots of work. >> >> Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to >> differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into >> a report. > > The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket > could give a hint on how to complicated the review was. > Sometime reviewer does not take a note of what he has tested [assuming reporter has already done clever job] unless package fails that test. So, number of comments are also not a good hint. -- rakesh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
