On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even > flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews > of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review > of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review > queue for many months and needed lots of work. Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into a report. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
