2009/1/2 Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even >> flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews >> of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review >> of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review >> queue for many months and needed lots of work. > > Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to > differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into > a report. The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket could give a hint on how to complicated the review was. - Thomas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
