Rahul Sundaram wrote:
That wasn't my question. My question is why not just use RHEL or CentOS
if you just going to duplicate the same stream of updates for Fedora as
well? It just seems busy work for no benefit.
That's precisely what I want to end up doing, but without the disruptive
need to re-install and figure out what all those differences you are
describing as problems are. And I'd rather not wait until the Centos
release to start planning local development. I suspect many others have
a similar development cycle and need about as much time as fedora itself
to arrive at something suitable for another long-term starting point.
So, the question is whether someone who understands all the internals
can plan a clean transition path and do it once, or whether every end
user that needs stability has to muddle through it separately.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
