Re: Stability and Release Cycles - An Idea

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 14:28 +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Ralf Corsepius [22/12/2008 13:51] :
> >
> > Right, implementing a fork is the last resort, when an opensource
> > project's leadership doesn't want listen.
> 
> That's not true.
> 
> We've discussed this idea several times and, when people are told that
> they need to show there's a group of contributors to this project before
> infrastructure is dedicated to it, they don't fork the updates, they
> start whining and making up a whole bunch of excuses to justify not
> doing the work.

We are turning in circles - It's a hen and egg problem.

FESCo brushes off volunteers, the @RHs (here A.C) gun-down any
volunteers, ... what do you expect prospective volunteers to think?

Patrice already turned away from Fedora, I for one have significantly
cut down my involvement into Fedora and am considering to further cut it
down.

Ralf
 



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux