-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dennis Gilmore schrieb: > from memory yes. you need a re-review then to EOL the old > package. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife > and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages > hint at it. We should make it crystal clear :) Hast this was the practice in the past. The disadvance of this process is the fact, that a re-review takes a long time. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklKkKMACgkQT2AHK6txfgxbBACePue+re0NVyyJ2tc9d1R5UBAF S7UAoLI3q0E0iM9QUU0+P6z4+BBIZb2X =cytl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
