Re: Proposed PackageRenaming guideline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "JS" == Jochen Schmitt <Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

JS> Hast this was the practice in the past. The disadvance of this
JS> process is the fact, that a re-review takes a long time.

I think you mean "can take a long time".  I have done re-reviews for
renames in an hour because someone asked me to.  Typically a re-review
is much quicker than the initial review.

As discussed on IRC, an important benefit of a re-review is the
insurance that the Obsoletes and Provides are done properly.  It is
easy to get this wrong, so another pair of eyes in the process is a
good idea.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux