Re: Proposed PackageRenaming guideline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 11:58 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> from memory yes.  you need a re-review  then to EOL the old package. 
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife and 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages 
> hint at it.  We should make it crystal clear  :)

There was recent discussion (on IRC) that some felt a full re-review as
"overkill" or worse "a waste of time".  I think it's fair to re-evaluate
what we're trying to accomplish with a re-review and re-assess if a full
review is indeed what "we" (IE the Fedora community, represented by
FESCo) want.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux