-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Fenzi schrieb: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages > After a first look on this proposel I have some question and comments: 1.) Is the approving process the same as if I submit a new package request. 2.) Because the CVSAdmin request need a bugzilla ticket, why we don't doing the relating approving process in the same ticket. 3.) If we not need a full review process, I think anyone should approve that the right Provides/Requires statement existing in the new package. A lightwight approvement process may has the advance that the maintaining process of an existing package will not delayed for a long time by the renaming process. 4.) Each people which has the right to done a normal package review should be abled to approve a renamed package. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAklKj48ACgkQT2AHK6txfgxCRgCcDKCAa6QRoAmNfbzUrz4Q2/r5 5VMAoJQvuJ2XYct9LqWLWAXY+/z8bbVX =TzfD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
