On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 21:39 -0600, Jerry Amundson wrote: > On 12/11/08, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Les Mikesell wrote: > >> No one is asking for that. The problems with fedora are that there is > >> no reason to expect any better stability at the end of a fedora version > >> than at the beginning > > > > Uh, Fedora releases _do_ tend to get more stable as updates come in. Taking > > aside the D-Bus fiasco, F9 is a lot better now than when it was released. > > Which implies F10 should have been good at it's release, as it > benefited from the F9 updates. Right. Correct, as far as packages are concerned, which happen to be identical or at least very similar in FC9 and FC10, their is such a effect. Unfortunately, this effect is outweighed by packages, F10 inherited from rawhide. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
