Re: What Fedora makes sucking for me - or why I am NOT Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 21:39 -0600, Jerry Amundson wrote:
> On 12/11/08, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Les Mikesell wrote:
> >> No one is asking for that.  The problems with fedora are that there is
> >> no reason to expect any better stability at the end of a fedora version
> >> than at the beginning
> >
> > Uh, Fedora releases _do_ tend to get more stable as updates come in. Taking
> > aside the D-Bus fiasco, F9 is a lot better now than when it was released.
> 
> Which implies F10 should have been good at it's release, as it
> benefited from the F9 updates. Right.
Correct, as far as packages are concerned, which happen to be identical
or at least very similar in FC9 and FC10, their is such a effect.

Unfortunately, this effect is outweighed by packages, F10 inherited from
rawhide.

Ralf


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux