On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:48:04PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 23:20 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> Le mercredi 10 décembre 2008 à 22:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : >> >> > ... then wait until your immature and hardly tested "new code" from >> > "rawhide" automatically becomes the "release". >> > >> > FC10 clearly demonstrates this effect. >> >> I don't think this is fair to releng and the QA teams. >Why is this not fair? The technical facts on FC10 speak for themselves: >Rawhide and Fedora's release procedures as means for "Fedora release >preparation testing" don't work out. Examples of this? Do you have bug report numbers, regression cases, or any sort of data saying things are getting worse from a release stability perspective? I'm not saying you're wrong, but statements without facts are hard to swallow. If we're sucking it up, point us to where and how so things can be fixed. I have F10 on a number of machines and it's working fine, so my personal experience may be different than yours. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
